Edit detail for Campaigning 2.0 revision 2 of 1

changed:
-
Campaigning 2.0 is about the current wave of sites and technology that offer new opportunities and challenges to campaigning via interactive media.

Some related articles:

- `The technology with impact 2007 (1 Feb 08) <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7153642.stm>`_
- `Technologies on the rise in 2008 (1 Jan 08) <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/7147804.stm>`_
- `A blog about technology from BBC News <http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/technology/>`_

Proposed Topics
===============

- Using Facebook and MySpace for campaigning? (and what they have achieved)
- Campaign Aggregation: Learning and improving on the Bali collaboration experience
- Next Generation Social Networking Tools: OpenSocial, next-generation Facebook groups, etc.
- Strategy: Should organisations build their own social networks (Obama campaign and the growing list of white label social network platforms) or utilise networks where the supporters are (Facebook)? 
- Campaigning via Mobile Phones in 2008: Successes, pitfalls and the emerging potential

  - Related article: `The mobile web takes off (1 Feb 08) <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/click_online/7219518.stm>`_

  - Related article: `How the iPhone Blew Up the Wireless Industry (9 Jan 08) <http://www.wired.com/gadgets/wireless/magazine/16-02/ff_iphone>`_


- What is online community? Is the nature of online communications more push (email) or pull (RSS) in today's world?
- Developing Facebook applications? (more technical oriented)

  - Latest Update: `Facebook Apps On Any Website: Clever Move <http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/01/26/facebook-apps-on-any-website-clever-move/>`_

- What using video has achieved and how
- Widgets: Getting the content/action appeals/etc off our own websites and onto socialnetworking sites, blogs, phones, etc. Success stories, practical tips, best practices, what works and what doesn't...


From PatrickOlszowski Tue Jan 8 04:54:19 -0600 2008
From: Patrick Olszowski
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 04:54:19 -0600
Subject: Beyond facebook groups
Message-ID: <20080108045419-0600@www.fairsay.com>

We spent a while building a Facebook group of nearly 1400, only to find that beyond 1000 members we were prevented from emailing those who had joined.  I'd be really keen to hear about other peoples' experiences of how they moved facebook members into other channels.  Thanks, 
Patrick
Campaigns Manager
Action Medical Research

From ademoor Mon Mar 24 17:59:46 -0500 2008
From: ademoor
Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2008 17:59:46 -0500
Subject: Community activation
Message-ID: <20080324175946-0500@www.fairsay.com>

Many online collaborative communities, such as in e-campaigning, make use of a wide range of tools (wikis, mailing lists, Facebook, ...) to support them in their interactions. However, community members often get lost within and between the tools. How to "activate" community members in their various roles (discussants, summarizers, taggers, editors, ...) at the right moment for the right task in the right tool? How to build and keep energy levels high enough to keep people motivated to participate? How to prevent communication overload? 

From ademoor Tue Mar 25 13:51:49 -0500 2008
From: ademoor
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 13:51:49 -0500
Subject: Role of virtual worlds
Message-ID: <20080325135149-0500@www.fairsay.com>

Virtual worlds, in particular Second Life, have a lot of potential for serious applications (see for example some of the snapshots I took at the 1st Second Life International Conference 2007: Best Practices in Teaching, Learning, and Research: http://www.communitysense.net/info/?q=node/58 ) However, without clear goals, processes, and facilitation these complex environments are doomed to failure. What success and failure stories do eCampaigning participants have? What are the do-s and dont-s to make for example Second Life really work for campaigning purposes? Any guidelines, manuals, materials for successful activities "in world", both one time events and long-term collaborations? [Aldo de Moor, CommunitySense]